Forcing 5 year olds into homosexuality at school

david H · 18-09-2008, 08:13 PM

YCHTT, that is right. Apart from being a conspiracy theorist you have all the correct opinions. Safe isn't it?

Leo · 18-09-2008, 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Connor

Now I know you've been infected with the PC. Or you're a daywalker. One of the two.

LOL! No, I have light brown hair, and no freckles. It was meant to be a joke, but I was thinking about Cartman when I wrote about red-haired people. My cousin has red hair, freckles, pale skin - the whole bit, and he gets a lot of stick cos of it.

Not making fun of people has nothing to do with PC, it's just that I don't like people making fun of me (I get some stick here cos of my Brit accent,) so I wouldn't want to do that to others. And like it's not fair to make fun of people over things they can't control, is it?

Leo · 18-09-2008, 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff

Leo,young man,Your bottom line (pardon the pun)means nothing,but the rest of your post seems to say its ok to teach 5 year old kids about gay sex.

Five year olds are babies,and those who re-appear to push this filth at regular intervals need to be moved on because they are intent on restocking their ranks for the future,they are persistant.

Like someone said earlier,if it was natural for us all to be gay,how would mankind prolong its existance on the planet?

I never said anything like that. I agree that it is a dopey idea to teach young kids about sex, I just said that it is pointless to try and turn anyone (let alone little kids) gay, cos it doesn't work that way. Like you have to be gay to want to do gay things in sex, and if someone offered you a million quid to turn gay, you wouldn't cos you couldn't.

So, you ain't going to turn a 5 year old gay by telling him 'gay is good'. When he gets old enough to be interested in chicks, that is what he will do naturally - no matter what you tell him.

Leo · 18-09-2008, 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth

I take your point Leo, and I agree with a lot of what you say about sexuality, but these children know no better.

It's one thing to talk about respecting gay people and entirely another to talk about sexual pleasure.

I agree with you. If this is simply a programme to teach five year old kids about getting off, I think it is totally inappropriate, and should never be put in place, and I cannot see how it ever will be.

This quote from the article indicates that there might be a more acceptable agenda.

Quote:

The stated purpose of the project - which is operating in 14 primary schools - is to stop bullying and prejudice aimed at homosexuals.

The article concerned is a little alarmist in that it quotes opinions given as though they were enacted into law. But all I'm saying is if the intent is to turn little children into gays, then it is more than stupid, cos that can't be done for reasons I have already stated.

British-Conservatism · 20-09-2008, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leo

I agree with you. If this is simply a programme to teach five year old kids about getting off, I think it is totally inappropriate, and should never be put in place, and I cannot see how it ever will be.

This quote from the article indicates that there might be a more acceptable agenda.

The article concerned is a little alarmist in that it quotes opinions given as though they were enacted into law. But all I'm saying is if the intent is to turn little children into gays, then it is more than stupid, cos that can't be done for reasons I have already stated.

This is all about the homosexualisation of British youth and from what I can see it is working the numbers of homosexuals are increasing all the time.
We will likely end up sexually like Thailand in 30 years at this rate.

HM · 20-09-2008, 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by British-Conservatism

This is all about the homosexualisation of British youth and from what I can see it is working the numbers of homosexuals are increasing all the time.
We will likely end up sexually like Thailand in 30 years at this rate.

You can't make a straight person gay. Hence there is no such thing as "homosexualisation". And I don't see where at all anyone has ever said "homosexuality is preferable to heterosexuality". Also, I have no idea if so what kind of motive they would have?!

david H · 20-09-2008, 12:47 PM

Its taught in schools, promoted on TV and the Daily Star has cuddling models on the front page almost daily and the weak-minded go along with it because this propaganda breaks down their natural disgust and conditions thm into having another kind of fun. Also many young people are confused in adolescence and they are being corrupted by the state. Most of the ones we see now embarrassing us by holding hands in the street think they are making a public stand against prejudice . Poor manipulated fools.

HM · 20-09-2008, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by david H

Its taught in schools, promoted on TV and the Daily Star has cuddling models on the front page almost daily

The same applies for heterosexuality.

Quote:

Originally Posted by david H

and the weak-minded go along with it because this propaganda breaks down their natural disgust and conditions thm into having another kind of fun.

"Natural disgust". No. The disgust they were taught by the primitive religions' bogus morality. If you want to get on to nature though, I think you'll find homosexuality is widespread in the animal kingdom.

Quote:

Originally Posted by david H

Also many young people are confused in adolescence and they are being corrupted by the state.

I repeat: you can't make a straight person gay. Perhaps you could in a Spartan "mentor system" thing, but nothing of the sort is happening in the UK, 2008.

Quote:

Originally Posted by david H

Most of the ones we see now embarrassing us by holding hands in the street think they are making a public stand against prejudice . Poor manipulated fools.

Or maybe they are just showing their affection for one another, just like straight couples do? BTW, what do you mean "manipulated"? You think that no-one is naturally homosexual and they are taught to be it? Don't make me laugh.

British-Conservatism · 20-09-2008, 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HM

You can't make a straight person gay. Hence there is no such thing as "homosexualisation". And I don't see where at all anyone has ever said "homosexuality is preferable to heterosexuality". Also, I have no idea if so what kind of motive they would have?!

Of course you can.
The young in particular can be moulded into any sexuality you like.
If we where all born a certain way sexually then public schools and certain sections of society wouldnt have far higher levels of homosexuality would they.

British-Conservatism · 20-09-2008, 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HM

The same applies for heterosexuality.

"Natural disgust". No. The disgust they were taught by the primitive religions' bogus morality. If you want to get on to nature though, I think you'll find homosexuality is widespread in the animal kingdom.

I repeat: you can't make a straight person gay. Perhaps you could in a Spartan "mentor system" thing, but nothing of the sort is happening in the UK, 2008.

Or maybe they are just showing their affection for one another, just like straight couples do? BTW, what do you mean "manipulated"? You think that no-one is naturally homosexual and they are taught to be it? Don't make me laugh.

You mention homosexuality is widespread in the animal kingdom.
Well so is paedophila, incest and rape should that be our model?

18-09-2008, 08:13 PM	#21 (permalink)
david H Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 1,758	YCHTT, that is right. Apart from being a conspiracy theorist you have all the correct opinions. Safe isn't it? __________________ "You think you are combatting prejudice but you are at war with nature". Edmund Burke. http://www.buchanan.org/pa-98-1127.html

20-09-2008, 12:47 PM	#27 (permalink)
david H Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 1,758	Its taught in schools, promoted on TV and the Daily Star has cuddling models on the front page almost daily and the weak-minded go along with it because this propaganda breaks down their natural disgust and conditions thm into having another kind of fun. Also many young people are confused in adolescence and they are being corrupted by the state. Most of the ones we see now embarrassing us by holding hands in the street think they are making a public stand against prejudice . Poor manipulated fools. __________________ "You think you are combatting prejudice but you are at war with nature". Edmund Burke. http://www.buchanan.org/pa-98-1127.html

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode