+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: GLW on Clark

  1. #1
    On A Break johnwest has a little shameless behaviour in the past
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Suffolk
    Posts
    1,527

    GLW on Clark

    Interesting extract on Derek Clark taken from GLW blog

    Derek Clark MEP EUkip 2004 to 2009+
    OLAF Case Number: D/007/033/04.09.08Derek Clark
    OLAF Investigation Number: DD/FD-D2008.A1/7133/OF/2008/0240

    Derek Clarke gave an undertaking in 2004 prior to the election to Ian Gillman No. 2 on the list that if he permitted Kilroy Silk to join the list at No. 2 he would personally stand down within a year as he was far too old to do the job for longer. Derek Clarke is a liar.

    Derek Clarke attended a public meeting as a EUkip MEP and boasted to the audience as to how easily he was able to defraud the EU and how he was doing so!

    Derek Clarke also, on the instruction of Nigel Farage signed a concordance with Romania seeking GREATER Subsidiarity for Britain to The EU and undertaking to work WITH the EU to strengthen its committees and control over Britain.

    This dishonest and treacherous geriatric who has we understand fallen foul of OLAF based upon abuse of tax payers' money - related to his using public money to fund Andrew Fear, Niall Warry (there is no implication that either of them were aware of any abuse). Also we understand that Clarke used money from Ashford to fund Tony Ellwood who worked for him.

    There is some reason to believe that staff of Clarke's with or without his approval made criminal false allegations regarding Tony, made anonimouisly and leading to a gross and irresponsible over reaction by the police. There are also claims that Ron Ransome another of Clarke's staff malliciously distributed a malware computer virus - a matter currently under investigation by the police.

    Derek Clark MEP EUkip 2004 to 2009+
    OLAF Case Number: D/007/033/04.09.08Derek Clark
    OLAF Investigation Number: DD/FD-D2008.A1/7133/OF/2008/0240

    Derek Clarke gave an undertaking in 2004 prior to the election to Ian Gillman No. 2 on the list that if he permitted Kilroy Silk to join the list at No. 2 he would personally stand down within a year as he was far too old to do the job for longer. Derek Clarke is a liar.

    Derek Clarke attended a public meeting as a EUkip MEP and boasted to the audience as to how easily he was able to defraud the EU and how he was doing so!

    Derek Clarke also, on the instruction of Nigel Farage signed a concordance with Romania seeking GREATER Subsidiarity for Britain to The EU and undertaking to work WITH the EU to strengthen its committees and control over Britain.

    This dishonest and treacherous geriatric who has we understand fallen foul of OLAF based upon abuse of tax payers' money - related to his using public money to fund Andrew Fear, Niall Warry (there is no implication that either of them were aware of any abuse). Also we understand that Clarke used money from Ashford to fund Tony Ellwood who worked for him.

    There is some reason to believe that staff of Clarke's with or without his approval made criminal false allegations regarding Tony, made anonimouisly and leading to a gross and irresponsible over reaction by the police. There are also claims that Ron Ransome another of Clarke's staff malliciously distributed a malware computer virus - a matter currently under investigation by the police.

    To read the full version see - CATERPILLARS and BUTTERFLIES: #538* - OLAF AGAIN - OF/2009/0487
    Last edited by johnwest; 02-07-2009 at 04:40 PM.

  2. #2
    Trusted Member mkpdavies is just really nice mkpdavies is just really nice mkpdavies is just really nice mkpdavies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    38,605
    mkpdavies no longer posts on this forum

  3. #3
    Senior Member skeptyk has some supporters skeptyk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    748

    So going back to your post recently about Nattrass being under investigation where you stated that in the interest of justice, you wouldn't comment, can I ask why Clarke is not afforded that same privilage? Is it because he chaired the disciplinary panel that led to your explusion from UKIP?

    Actually what is the point of the thread you started about Watkins being banned? You post his rants on here anyway so he does have a voice. He may as well not be banned if people like you do his spade work for him.

  4. #4
    On A Break johnwest has a little shameless behaviour in the past
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Suffolk
    Posts
    1,527

    Quote Originally Posted by skeptyk View Post
    So going back to your post recently about Nattrass being under investigation where you stated that in the interest of justice, you wouldn't comment, can I ask why Clarke is not afforded that same privilage? Is it because he chaired the disciplinary panel that led to your explusion from UKIP?

    Actually what is the point of the thread you started about Watkins being banned? You post his rants on here anyway so he does have a voice. He may as well not be banned if people like you do his spade work for him.
    So when was it illegal to post extracts from other sites? I was told ages ago as long as you did not post the whole thing it would be fine.

    And as for Nattrass you will sadly have to wait.

  5. #5
    Senior Member skeptyk has some supporters skeptyk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    748

    Quote Originally Posted by johnwest View Post
    So when was it illegal to post extracts from other sites? I was told ages ago as long as you did not post the whole thing it would be fine.

    And as for Nattrass you will sadly have to wait.
    Ah I see. Its seems to be a case of the double standards when it comes to your reticence to talk about Nattrass whereas you will speak openly about Clarke. The same double standards that you accuse Brendan Padmore of showing when he mods the UKIP pages. Practise what you preach, my dear fellow

    Allow me to play you at your own game West - you haven't denied that Clarke gets special treatment because he chaired the panel that booted you out of a party which you yourself have called a sinking ship and a disgrace. Which makes me wonder then why are you so upset about leaving a party you seem to despise so much...

    So because you haven't denied it, is it true?

  6. #6
    Senior Member skeptyk has some supporters skeptyk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    748

    Incidentally, I know it isn't illegal to post from other sites. I just think protesting over Watkins' ban is pointless when you (amongst others) post his diatribes on here anyway

  7. #7
    Banned rienzi is just starting out
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    26

    Is this the usual standard of debate on here? People trading insults? Even the moderators, it seems, are not adverse to doing this. We need more people like Barboo on here.
    Last edited by rienzi; 03-07-2009 at 10:20 AM.

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts