Mark Croucher

Ah, this old nonsense again. Saying it repeatedly doesn't make it true, at least not in the sense meant. Not that that stops this same old distortion being rolled out to defend BNP infiltrators. I'm surprised you haven't gone straight for the 'he handed the membership lists over to Searchlight for checking' cobblers.

SponPlague

As I recall, Mark, you were always careful not to specify what the arrangements were, so it's difficult for them to be clear about this...

B.A.Ware

Thank you, if only GLW would follow your lead

__________________
We’re not just about Europe.

Geoffrey Collier

david h: I am not at all surprised, it is an oft repeated story. It appears that Searchlight are either not very efficient, or sympathetic to the New Britain Party. I hope that we shall soon enter a better era for the fortunes of UKIP. From what I hear from the coffee houses of England, is that conclusion of the judicial review will signal new changes. A party in which the leadership is being constantly investigated, and concerns about disappearing donations and elusive bank accounts are legion, obviously needs a reappraisal of our methods and cultural.

Geoffrey Collier

Sorry 'cultural climate'.

Mark Croucher

Haha... what time is hell due to freeze over?

M

SponPlague

Quite soon, given UKIP don't belive in global warming

Mark Croucher

Just perusing Liar-Watkins latest missive, where he says:

So imagine my surprise to find such a paragon of integrity wrote:

and
and
There's much more in the same vein dating bck to 1999 that I have to hand, but I can't be bothered to read such drivel. It's sufficient to get the idea though.

But don't I have a recollection of someone saying.....?

So, what do you think it will be? An apology for mis-leading his readers, assuming anyone can be bothered to wade through such turgid fantasy, or another long-winded rant?

Rgds

M

T.N.Warry

This is spin and selective quoting Mark as well you know

For far to long the media has dominated the agenda by ridiculing all those who dare to think and speak outside the cosy centre ground consensus

GLW certainly doesn't follow any cosy centre ground consensus. Look at the mess following the centre ground has got us.

GLW is always clear to criticise Zionists NOT Jews. There is a big difference as you should know.

GLW has NEVER praised the BNP unless you quote him out of connect

GLW has forthright views you should debate with him sometime it is an education.

GLW is always prepared to debate his views in public with anyone who asks.

He is right wing libertarian a Conservative with a small c, which is pretty unfashionable these days.

Anyway no doubt you'll keep pumpimg out your spin it probably helps you digest your food

Mark Croucher

Actually, he used to describe the BNP as 'another patriotic party', but that may have been before you knew him. It's difficult to keep up with views which change so often.

Just so we're clear, he said:

And
I can't wait to hear his excuse for empathising with such charming characters as

But then I'm not surprised, if he had Nick Griffin phoning him up and asking if he could pop round for the weekend. Perhaps he wanted some tips as he'd forgotten section 3 of the BNP manifesto, 'Holocaust Denial'.

And, from Hamas' point of view
And it's no use claiming it's selective quoting, it isn't. We've all been subjected to such missives from him in the past. It's worth remembering that Hamas are the moderate group in the list of people he empathises with.

M