![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Legalise Euthanasia? | |||
| Yes |
|
9 | 64.29% |
| No |
|
2 | 14.29% |
| Steer well clear of the subject! |
|
3 | 21.43% |
| Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 349
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Paddling up 5hit creek.....
Posts: 7,786
![]() |
Strangely, I'm with son of robert on this one. Making abortion illegal will just drive it INTO phpbb_the realms of the back streets and/or old ladies with knitting needles (as my mother told me, many years ago).
Of course, provision should be made to stop unwanted pregnancy in the first place, and make adoption easier in the second. One of the crimes of the recent governments is the sheer difficulty inb actually adopting, made worse by rules on ethnicity - it is more difficult to adopt outsider of your own colour - honestly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 352
![]() |
Quote:
Don't know what a neo-con is (although I've heard the term) - obviously a derogatory term for someone who thinks abortion a barbaric form of birth control. Lifestyle abortions even worse. Convince me that having an abortion is ok if it means not missing out on that all important promotion or being able to buy that dream house. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 352
![]() |
Quote:
It is a barbaric form of birth control. Pure and simple. There was a programme the other day showing a pile of processed meat a family ate in one month. The meat when packaged on a supermarket shelf can look reasonably attractive and edible. The meat piled up looked disgusting. As a meat eater it made me feel queasy. TRy turning away from the image of the clinical, caring, women's rights, abotion clinics, and imagine a pile of 180,000 aborted babies. That is the society we live in. Why the hang up over euthanasia? That's my point. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 625
![]() |
Neo-Con = Neo-Conservative. In political terms it means someone who used to be left wing, but then jumped to the right. A classic example is Dubya and his gang of Merry Men who rule America according to their religious beliefs.
Please also note: don't take a patronising tone with me. Your talk of 'deam houses' and 'promotions' clearly illustrate that you know little of what you are talking about, and no regards of the rights a woman should have over her own body. Here are a few started points for you: 1) Today's economy is reliant on a male and female workforce. A woman cannot function properly in society if she doesn't have control over her reproductive system. 2) When you make abortion illegal, the number of abortions don't decrease, but the number of women who die as a consequence of being forced onto the 'back streets' do. I could, at this point, wave around a picture of a dead woman, but I prefer not to let emotions take over this issue. 3) Most abortions happen before 3 months, yet sometimes it takes this long for a woman to realise she is pregnant. I'm sure we can dig up from our memory those pictures on the front of the Daily Outrage but let's all remember this: a foetus can't survive outside the womb much before 7 months. If a pregnant woman is murdered and both her and the foetus are killed, it is not a double murder. The law can see that the foetus is not something in it's own right at that point. One cannot have 'rights' without 'responsibilities'. 4) Birth control fails, and people get raped. **** happens in life and whilst one must be prepared to face the consequences, there also must be measures in place. I'm guessing you don't want me to go INTO phpbb_more detail about this section.... 5) Pro-choice isn't about telling people to have abortions. Women don't want to have to go through them - they are traumatic and invasive. They don't use them as a form of birth control either. So please, don't just sit there with your penis and patronise - just be thankful you will never have to make that decision. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Banbury, England
Posts: 198
![]() |
To me abortion's quite simple. I don't have the right to parasite off someone else against their will, not even if it were the only thing keeping me alive. I didn't have that right either as a baby. I was a guest, as are all other babies, and an unwanted guest may be ejected. Their continued survival thereafter is not the host's problem.
As for euthanasia, I own my own body and may suicide or grant others permission to kill me. Check that I really meant it? Sure, no problem. Forcibly prevent me or my delegate? That would amount to a competing claim of ownership, ie: of slave-ownership, and I reject it. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]