British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Political Parties > Liberal Democrat General Issues


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-08-2008, 03:45 AM   #11 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,511
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Westcountryman View Post
What a crock of ****!

I've yet to see a government that is sympathetic to, supportive of or adequately funds the rural areas of the UK!
Absolutely !
Out of interest why do you think that really is Westcountryman ?
__________________
Before tyranny and television, "conspiracy theorists" never existed.

cointelpro/halfwits(in order of Porkpies) Clippo,Wowbanger TIP, Akria,Besoeker,Bear,Eurosceptic Antlantacist
youcanhandlethetruth is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 08-08-2008, 11:57 AM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
whypatcondellisntfun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 821
whypatcondellisntfun is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
Education and truth is key.
I see your point. I'm aware of the issues of 9/11, and I think at the very least parts of US government were prepared to sit back and let it happen. I'm not verses enough in engineering to know if WTC 1 & 2 the towers were brought down by explosives, but I certainly think that WTC 7 was brought down deliberately as I've not seen any convincing explanation for why it went down other than planned demolition.

But my point was this.

Say the public become educated and are aware of the truth. What then? Overthrow government? What would you replace it with?
__________________
"I have set and always will set my face like flint against making any difference between one citizen of this country and another on grounds of his origin" - Enoch Powell
whypatcondellisntfun is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 11:59 AM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
whypatcondellisntfun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 821
whypatcondellisntfun is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whypatcondellisntfun View Post
Say the public become educated and are aware of the truth. What then? Overthrow government? What would you replace it with?
For the avoidance of doubt. I'm not suggesting the overthrowing of any government. I'm simply asking, what practical system could viably replace the governmental system we have now?
__________________
"I have set and always will set my face like flint against making any difference between one citizen of this country and another on grounds of his origin" - Enoch Powell
whypatcondellisntfun is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 12:15 PM   #14 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Westcountryman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Westcountry.
Posts: 5,922
Party: None
Westcountryman is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
Absolutely !
Out of interest why do you think that really is Westcountryman ?
I'm not entirely sure. It's probably down to the low population density and the fact we're so isolated and "out of the way". It's funny actually how few government initiatives/laws actually affect the rural way of life - our policemen are still very un-PC (except the ones who transfer in) and most people carry on as normal (Health and Safety officers would probably die of a heart attack if they came here). The biggest assault on rural life recently was probably the fox-hunting ban - fox-hunting being something that again few people in the cities actually have any knowledge or appreciation of.

I also put it down to the people in government/Parliament having 0 appreciation for how things work in the countryside or the rural way of life - which of course is fundamentally different to towns and cities (it's amazing how many tourists have no appreciation of how things work like here - for example I am repeatedly asked where the Tesco of the village is - we don't have one.)

I'm a firm believer that the rural way of life is superior to that of the cities, but I may be biased. I wonder how many MPs would be squeamish at the sight of an animal being slaughtered - few people down here would bat an eyelid.
__________________
Manus haec inimica tyrannis ense petit placidam sub libertate quietam - "This hand of mine, which is hostile to tyrants, seeks by the sword quiet peace under liberty."

Last edited by Westcountryman; 08-08-2008 at 12:17 PM.
Westcountryman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2008, 06:23 AM   #15 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,511
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whypatcondellisntfun View Post
For the avoidance of doubt. I'm not suggesting the overthrowing of any government. I'm simply asking, what practical system could viably replace the governmental system we have now?
You could still have a fair system of democratic government but one that kept to whatever constitution of that country.

In the case of the U.S and Britain passing illegal laws that is certainly not the case.

For example warantless wiretapping in the U.S, loss of speech laws in the UK and U.S(the 1st amendment in the U.S should protect that), passing powers over to executive branches of government (like the EU treaty here which makes the power of parliament redundant and PDD51 in the States - i.e. Bush declares himself supreme dictator and immune from prosecution(think that's right)).

Basically whenever the government rides roughshot over the constitution, (which has checks and balances in place to prevent governments abusing their power) and ignores the wishes of the people, then it is the right if the people to remove them from office, especially if the government removes the constitution !

And that's not forgetting the other crimes carried out by heads of state such as Blur and Bosh like illegal wars, government sponsored terorism etc etc !

Only when the corrupt system is broken can prosecutions begin.

Still think overthrowing the government is a bad idea ?

But of course the key is to get people involved in real political thinking so "we the people....." (like in the constitution) can be re-form the new political process.

People will wake up eventually, but they'll have suffered one heck of a lot by then - a lot lot more than they realize.
__________________
Before tyranny and television, "conspiracy theorists" never existed.

cointelpro/halfwits(in order of Porkpies) Clippo,Wowbanger TIP, Akria,Besoeker,Bear,Eurosceptic Antlantacist
youcanhandlethetruth is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2008, 06:29 AM   #16 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,511
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default

By the way WPCIS, good question !

You'll notice I didn't actually suggest a different political system, just a change of government itself (i.e. if it breaks certain rules, replace them)

I wish I knew more about this whole question - it's a good one I admit.

I don't think that means governements can do whatever they like because they were voted in though - maybe there need to be extra checks and balances but the trouble is, any corrupt system has an annoying habit of corrupting the system and laws which is meant to keep watch over them and execute these said laws - therein lies the problem and how to stop it.....
__________________
Before tyranny and television, "conspiracy theorists" never existed.

cointelpro/halfwits(in order of Porkpies) Clippo,Wowbanger TIP, Akria,Besoeker,Bear,Eurosceptic Antlantacist
youcanhandlethetruth is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2008, 06:41 AM   #17 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,511
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Westcountryman View Post
I'm not entirely sure. It's probably down to the low population density and the fact we're so isolated and "out of the way". It's funny actually how few government initiatives/laws actually affect the rural way of life - our policemen are still very un-PC (except the ones who transfer in) and most people carry on as normal (Health and Safety officers would probably die of a heart attack if they came here). The biggest assault on rural life recently was probably the fox-hunting ban - fox-hunting being something that again few people in the cities actually have any knowledge or appreciation of.

I also put it down to the people in government/Parliament having 0 appreciation for how things work in the countryside or the rural way of life - which of course is fundamentally different to towns and cities (it's amazing how many tourists have no appreciation of how things work like here - for example I am repeatedly asked where the Tesco of the village is - we don't have one.)

I'm a firm believer that the rural way of life is superior to that of the cities, but I may be biased. I wonder how many MPs would be squeamish at the sight of an animal being slaughtered - few people down here would bat an eyelid.
I'm glad you say "It's funny actually how few government initiatives/laws actually affect the rural way of life" - that's a good thing, and actually "having 0 appreciation for how things work in the countryside or the rural way of life" is probably a blessing in disguise.

I say that because my feeling is that governement would like to hurt rural Britain as much as it probably could (could it ?).

I'm sure they'd want large Tesco's to take over the food chain and eliminate the common farmer who grows organic food and move them onto Gm crops at the drop of a hat to seize control of the food chain. Maybe they are......

I hope what you say is true, and rural life remains untampered and unharmed without the state imposing horrible EU regulations everywhere(though it probably does as much as it can)

I'm sure the fox hunting ban was such an attack on the rural way of life and had nothing to do with foxhunting.
__________________
Before tyranny and television, "conspiracy theorists" never existed.

cointelpro/halfwits(in order of Porkpies) Clippo,Wowbanger TIP, Akria,Besoeker,Bear,Eurosceptic Antlantacist
youcanhandlethetruth is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2008, 04:47 PM   #18 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Besoeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,009
Besoeker is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whypatcondellisntfun View Post
II'm not verses enough in engineering to know if WTC 1 & 2 the towers were brought down by explosives, but I certainly think that WTC 7 was brought down deliberately
Weren't all three brought down by deliberate action?
Besoeker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2008, 12:08 AM   #19 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,511
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Besoeker View Post
Weren't all three brought down by deliberate action?
Of course they were, but not eveyone believes every single aspect 100%.

For example, despite the undisputed scientific proof, some still want to lie to themsleves and believe a Boeing hit the pentagon.


Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? Professor

"Unlike WTC7, the twin towers appear to have been exploded “top-down” rather than proceeding from the bottom – which is unusual for controlled demolition but clearly possible, depending on the order in which explosives are detonated. That is, explosives may have been placed on higher floors of the towers and exploded via radio signals so as to have early explosions near the region where the plane entered the tower. Certainly this hypothesis ought to be seriously considered in an independent investigation using all available data."

"The occurrence of nearly symmetrical, straight-down and complete collapses of the WTC 7 and the Towers is particularly upsetting to the “official” theory that random fires plus damage caused all these collapses. Even with explosives, achieving such results requires a great deal of pre-planning and expertise."

Sorry too much to post - just read the article....
__________________
Before tyranny and television, "conspiracy theorists" never existed.

cointelpro/halfwits(in order of Porkpies) Clippo,Wowbanger TIP, Akria,Besoeker,Bear,Eurosceptic Antlantacist
youcanhandlethetruth is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 02:39 PM   #20 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
TannyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cafe Rene. :D
Posts: 835
TannyD is just starting out
Default

I vaguely remember watching a programme on TV that mentioned a friendship between Osama Bin Laden and some Amercian people. Could it be that Osama was paid and that the whole issue surrounding Twin Towers was a complex set-up becuase of the state of the building, perhaps because it had become a white elephant in the eyes of the insurers?

Add to that the lack of emotion when Bush in a classroom was apparantly told about what had just happened, kinda like men faking surprise even though I know about my surprise Birthday party...
__________________
Ignore/Avoid List: youcanhandlethetruth.
TannyD is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0