A Free England Party take on globalisation

Andrew Constantine · 13-09-2008, 06:08 PM

While nationalists tend to support the nation state and look askance at globalisation, there seem to be some underhand motivations for British politicians (Brown, Milliband, Cameron etc) who keep on banging on about globalisation.

After all if these British rats can persuade electors that globalisation is such an inevitiable and powerful force, it has some beneficial consequences that favour their ideology and party, in that:

1. Globalisation is a wonderful excuse both for failed policies and the incompetence of politicians. Hence Brown will plead that the excesses of the US housing market are resulting in a UK recession. Odd then that France and Germany (presumeably affected by globalisation just as much as us) are not suffering a recession!

2. Citing globalisation is a credible means for concealing just how much sovereignty the spineless and corrupt British political elites have given away to the EU and to the USA. They say in effect that the citizen cannot, and should not, rely on England, but need to be part of a much larger grouping to withstand the forces of globalisation.

When you hear a British politician referring to globalisation, you should suspect that they are using it as a smokescreen.

the englishman · 14-09-2008, 11:09 AM

I would take it one step further and say that the EU is simply one step further towards elitism and the destruction of democracy that the ruling class crave. National identity and culture is a barrier to federalism, thus the blatant agenda of its destruction we see from Labour.

cassie · 14-09-2008, 11:10 AM

_______________________

If the FEP has to have 'a take' on globalisation', should it not include comparison of two, very different, standards in operation? Applied to economic factors, we are fed the line it is desirable and unstoppable, but applied to social/community issues in England we are expected to tolerate the absurd and destructive notion of being a majority.

Looked at globally - that is by the same standard as international commerce - we English are a small minority, and many of those who inflict themselves on the English (primarily for their purposes, rather than ours) are much more numerous! Yes, the Chinese [1,500 million], Indians [1,100 million], Pakistanis [165 million], Bangladeshis [145 million] etc etc vastly outnumber us, not only 'socially', as t'were, but as 'factors of production' [to use an economist term] ie as labour.

Moreover, we as a nation are handicapped by the legislation we've allowed to be enacted, which is helping both to disarm us and to destroy the nature of our society.

Too often, it seems that those in power have set out to destroy us completely. The question is whether you think they do this deliberately or not?

--------------------------

Northumbrian · 14-09-2008, 12:30 PM

They are hypocrites. On one hand they say the UK economy is so intertwined that it would be extremely difficult for Scotland, Wales, England to become nation states -

yet if we are so tightly linked to a global economy, then there won't be any difference between an British economy and separate English, Scottish, Welsh economies.

13-09-2008, 06:08 PM	#1 (permalink)
Andrew Constantine Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 951 Party: Free England Party	A Free England Party take on globalisation While nationalists tend to support the nation state and look askance at globalisation, there seem to be some underhand motivations for British politicians (Brown, Milliband, Cameron etc) who keep on banging on about globalisation. After all if these British rats can persuade electors that globalisation is such an inevitiable and powerful force, it has some beneficial consequences that favour their ideology and party, in that: 1. Globalisation is a wonderful excuse both for failed policies and the incompetence of politicians. Hence Brown will plead that the excesses of the US housing market are resulting in a UK recession. Odd then that France and Germany (presumeably affected by globalisation just as much as us) are not suffering a recession! 2. Citing globalisation is a credible means for concealing just how much sovereignty the spineless and corrupt British political elites have given away to the EU and to the USA. They say in effect that the citizen cannot, and should not, rely on England, but need to be part of a much larger grouping to withstand the forces of globalisation. When you hear a British politician referring to globalisation, you should suspect that they are using it as a smokescreen. __________________ Andrew Constantine says: The EU is a French-German racket and is incompatible with democracy. An independent England will quit the EU forthwith. Free England Party - Independence for England http://www.freeengland.com Signatory to The English Claim of Right http://englishclaimofright.com

14-09-2008, 11:09 AM	#2 (permalink)
the englishman Junior Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 72	I would take it one step further and say that the EU is simply one step further towards elitism and the destruction of democracy that the ruling class crave. National identity and culture is a barrier to federalism, thus the blatant agenda of its destruction we see from Labour. __________________ http://modernnationalist.blogspot.com/

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

14-09-2008, 11:10 AM	#3 (permalink)
cassie Uber Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,846	_______________________ If the FEP has to have 'a take' on globalisation', should it not include comparison of two, very different, standards in operation? Applied to economic factors, we are fed the line it is desirable and unstoppable, but applied to social/community issues in England we are expected to tolerate the absurd and destructive notion of being a majority. Looked at globally - that is by the same standard as international commerce - we English are a small minority, and many of those who inflict themselves on the English (primarily for their purposes, rather than ours) are much more numerous! Yes, the Chinese [1,500 million], Indians [1,100 million], Pakistanis [165 million], Bangladeshis [145 million] etc etc vastly outnumber us, not only 'socially', as t'were, but as 'factors of production' [to use an economist term] ie as labour. Moreover, we as a nation are handicapped by the legislation we've allowed to be enacted, which is helping both to disarm us and to destroy the nature of our society. Too often, it seems that those in power have set out to destroy us completely. The question is whether you think they do this deliberately or not? --------------------------

14-09-2008, 12:30 PM	#4 (permalink)
Northumbrian Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, England Posts: 1,409 Party: Free England Party	They are hypocrites. On one hand they say the UK economy is so intertwined that it would be extremely difficult for Scotland, Wales, England to become nation states - yet if we are so tightly linked to a global economy, then there won't be any difference between an British economy and separate English, Scottish, Welsh economies.