British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU and Euroscepticism > European Union


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-10-2008, 02:50 PM   #1 (permalink)
gc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 564
gc is an unknown quantity at this point
Default HMG slams European Commission

A mandate too far....?

Special interest article by Tom Wise MEP


The International Whaling Commission (IWC) met in Santiago, Chile, in June of this year to discuss, amongst other things, the survival status of a number of species of whales and porpoises. The western North Pacific Gray whale, Dall's and Vaquita porpoises, and some species of dolphin were singled out as being particularly vulnerable, and the importance of establishing whale sanctuaries and imposing strict limits on whaling were high on the agenda.

This meeting was notable, as it was the first time the European Commission has been given a mandate to speak on behalf of EU member states (although not all are members of the IWC).

Her Majesty's Government has expressed extreme dissatisfaction with the Commission's performance, and has declared that as a consequence, "(The) UK will have to reflect over the benefits of a future mandate. The UK will seek to maintain the right to speak in their own right at the IWC".

The UK which has been a member of the IWC since its inception in 1948, opposes virtually all forms of whaling, including the so-called "scientific" whaling carried out by Japan, the one exception to this being a limited amount of subsistence whaling for certain local communities. This very limited derogation applies to the native peoples of Alaska, Chukotka, Washington State, Greenland, and St Vincent and the Grenadines. The number of whales concerned is very small.

Citing the fact that the Inuit people of the US practice whaling with the blessing of the IWC, Japan claims a similar right on cultural grounds for its own people. Since the IWC moratorium on whaling came into effect in 1985-86, the Japanese unilaterally introduced the concept of "scientific whaling". This involves the "study" of the contents of whale's stomachs in the name of environmental research. More than 8,000 whales have been killed and their carcasses then sold to Japanese consumers. This contrasts somewhat with the 67 whales per year that the American Inuit are allowed to land.

In a clear disregard for international protocol, Japanese whalers regularly take whales in Australian waters, which have been declared a whale sanctuary. It is an offence to kill whales in Australian waters, as confirmed by that country's federal court in January of this year. The Australian Labour Party has pledged to use military force if necessary to prevent future whaling in Antarctic waters.

As pointed out in a recent report from the EP Environment Committee, under the EU Habitats Directive no commercial whaling of any kind can be allowed in EU waters. The Commission however, having worked hard to secure a mandate to speak for member states at the IWC, found itself out of its depth, a dangerous place to be in such a contentious political arena. Those member states, such as the UK, with very strong positions on this issue consequently found themselves very poorly represented.

One might be forgiven for thinking that there could be other policy areas where individual member states might make a better job of defending our mutual interests than the unelected Commission.
gc is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 10-10-2008, 09:55 AM   #2 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Mikeuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,737
Party: Conservatives
Mikeuk is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gc View Post
A mandate too far....?

Special interest article by Tom Wise MEP


The International Whaling Commission (IWC) met in Santiago, Chile, in June of this year to discuss, amongst other things, the survival status of a number of species of whales and porpoises. The western North Pacific Gray whale, Dall's and Vaquita porpoises, and some species of dolphin were singled out as being particularly vulnerable, and the importance of establishing whale sanctuaries and imposing strict limits on whaling were high on the agenda.

This meeting was notable, as it was the first time the European Commission has been given a mandate to speak on behalf of EU member states (although not all are members of the IWC).

Her Majesty's Government has expressed extreme dissatisfaction with the Commission's performance, and has declared that as a consequence, "(The) UK will have to reflect over the benefits of a future mandate. The UK will seek to maintain the right to speak in their own right at the IWC".

The UK which has been a member of the IWC since its inception in 1948, opposes virtually all forms of whaling, including the so-called "scientific" whaling carried out by Japan, the one exception to this being a limited amount of subsistence whaling for certain local communities. This very limited derogation applies to the native peoples of Alaska, Chukotka, Washington State, Greenland, and St Vincent and the Grenadines. The number of whales concerned is very small.

Citing the fact that the Inuit people of the US practice whaling with the blessing of the IWC, Japan claims a similar right on cultural grounds for its own people. Since the IWC moratorium on whaling came into effect in 1985-86, the Japanese unilaterally introduced the concept of "scientific whaling". This involves the "study" of the contents of whale's stomachs in the name of environmental research. More than 8,000 whales have been killed and their carcasses then sold to Japanese consumers. This contrasts somewhat with the 67 whales per year that the American Inuit are allowed to land.

In a clear disregard for international protocol, Japanese whalers regularly take whales in Australian waters, which have been declared a whale sanctuary. It is an offence to kill whales in Australian waters, as confirmed by that country's federal court in January of this year. The Australian Labour Party has pledged to use military force if necessary to prevent future whaling in Antarctic waters.

As pointed out in a recent report from the EP Environment Committee, under the EU Habitats Directive no commercial whaling of any kind can be allowed in EU waters. The Commission however, having worked hard to secure a mandate to speak for member states at the IWC, found itself out of its depth, a dangerous place to be in such a contentious political arena. Those member states, such as the UK, with very strong positions on this issue consequently found themselves very poorly represented.

One might be forgiven for thinking that there could be other policy areas where individual member states might make a better job of defending our mutual interests than the unelected Commission.
Why are you telling us about Tom Wise, Gary?

He was kicked out of the UKIP group, he's under arrest and he's on police bail.

Step forward Ashley Mote Mk II
__________________
'We will not build a peaceful world by following a negative path. It is not enough to say "We must not wage war." It is necessary to love peace and sacrifice for it. We must concentrate not merely on the negative expulsion of war, but on the positive affirmation of peace.'

Martin Luther King Jr 1964
Mikeuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2008, 01:08 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Zak64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Little Poland On Sea (Bournemouth)
Posts: 754
Zak64 is just starting out
Default

Oh hurrah! Rejoice! The EU Commission is going to save the whales!

Well, the whales must be sleeping soundly in their beds (eh?) tonight, safe in the knowledge that the EU Commission is going to save them!

Just one slight concern. Would this be the same EU Commission that administers the Common Fisheries Policy that has brought North Sea Cod stocks to the very brink of collapse?
__________________
"There's no way to rule innocent men.
The only power government has is the power to crack down on criminals.
Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them.
One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws."~ Ayn Rand.
Zak64 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
Ashley Mote, Tom Wise

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0