![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#71 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
|
I think I may be a bit late to the party, but meh.
I'm human, British and English. But human first and foremost.
__________________
I am getting very tired of people not reading my posts properly. Please do not reply to me unless you are sure you have not missed out the key points I am making and key words I am using. http://real-democracy.co.uk | Admin and proud The commonality of mankind: If you prick us, do we not bleed? If you tickle us, do we not laugh? If you poison us, do we not die? |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Between Mallaig and Cornwall.
Posts: 2,809
![]() |
You got it the wrong way round Akria. Those social groupings closer to you are likely to have had the most formative elements upon your personality.
__________________
"It is poor civic hygiene to install technologies that could someday facilitate a police state." -Bruce Schneier How to Overthrow the System: brew your own beer; kick in your TV; build your own cabin and p*ss off front porch whenever you bloody well feel like it. Edward Abbey Leopold Kohr. |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Between Mallaig and Cornwall.
Posts: 2,809
![]() |
Quote:
It is these social groupings such nationality(in a limited way.) which through their functional and ideational role shape a lot of our identites, interests, personalities and meanings. To the degree these are healthy will have a large impact on the well being of the people. We should have pride for them because of this importance in our lives and to keep them supported, but that shouldn't be irrational pride and patriotism. I'd argue nations like Britain and England are far too large for their ideational supports to be healthily linked with the material and functional realities of real life humans who must live on a human scale, but that perhaps is a different argument. Also of course states, gov'ts and nations are just one part of human social bonds and associations, and in many way not the most important particularly past the local level, and should not be pushed so much the rest are forgotten
__________________
"It is poor civic hygiene to install technologies that could someday facilitate a police state." -Bruce Schneier How to Overthrow the System: brew your own beer; kick in your TV; build your own cabin and p*ss off front porch whenever you bloody well feel like it. Edward Abbey Leopold Kohr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 949
Party: English Democrats
![]() |
Quote:
Social cohesion, through what ever means (I prefer nationalism) is the stuff of nationhood, it brings people together to fight for causes that they collectively see as damaging to that cohesive element. It gives a sense of belonging, a wish to help those in less fortunate situations. witness the charities that gain from this feeling, I would list the good causes but am not inclined to insult your intelligence, it would be nice if you returned the compliment. It allows the coming together in times of strife, wether that strife is man made or natural. Just for starters.
__________________
Little Englander (bigoted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 949
Party: English Democrats
![]() |
[quote=BonnieDundee;546982]
Also of course states, gov'ts and nations are just one part of human social bonds and associations, and in many way not the most important particularly past the local level, and should not be pushed so much the rest are forgotten[/QUOTE It is true that all tiers of social cohesion have a role to play, there are actions that are beyond the competence and resources of local groups that may be solved by bigger groups, which is why, and here I see a bit of "regionalism" creeping into your arguement, splitting nations into smaller groups will only serve to cause jealousy and infighting as witnessed by the inequalities that are percieved to exist between the constituent countries of the United (ha ha) Kingdom. A neighbouring "region" that is "percieved" to be more favourably treated, and don't tell me it won't happen, is going to react with a certain amount od animosity, Cross border raids ring any bells?
__________________
Little Englander (bigoted) |
|
|
|
|
|
#76 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 558
Party: UKIP
![]() |
British? English? Some say it already has no meaning apart from the paperwork. After this it definitely will not:
Sunday Express | UK News :: Secret plot to let 50million African workers into EU |
|
|
|
|
|
#77 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,846
![]() |
Quote:
- |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]