The Barnett Formula re-visited by the Lib Dems

cassie · 16-09-2008, 09:52 AM

-

Quote:

'Fiscal decentralisation' to solve English question

Monday, 15 Sep 2008 10:17

Reviewing the formula used to allocate public money given to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland is the first step towards an English parliament, it was suggested last night.

A panel of experts convened at the Liberal Democrat conference in Bournemouth to look at the "ticking timebomb" of the English question.

Debate over the need for an English parliament has risen in recent years, with prime minister Gordon Brown consistently emphasising his 'Britishness' in an effort to avert the separatist ambitions of Scotland.

Kenyon Wright, former chair of the Scottish constitutional convention, said: "An English parliament would certainly break the union as it is at present. But would it means the end of any kind of meaningful union? No."

He expects the Barnett formula will exacerbate tensions. At present it is used to distribute public spending between the UK's four countries. Scotland receives 22 per cent more spending per head than England, while Wales (14 per cent) and Northern Ireland (30 per cent) also receive more.

IPPR director Guy Isaby said: "Devolution has magnified the funding disparities… the Barnett formula squeezed the idea that spending would converge."

And Professor John Curtice of Strathclyde University said a Conservative government faced a "win-win" situation where giving back fiscal autonomy to Scotland could help both sides.

"The Barnett formula is already being revived from a Scottish perspective through the Calman Commission," he pointed out, adding it is "creating the need for change."

The polls appear to suggest the only area of devolution issues where opinion is moving is on the financial settlement. At the start of the decade, one-fifth said it was unfair; that is now up to one-third in Scotland.

Mr Isaby added: "There has to be a policy intervention… scrap the Barnett formula and move to a system of fiscal decentralisation."

He suggested, however, that such a move is unlikely in the near future. "The current position of the government is to hope this goes away," he added. "But not doing anything is not the answer."

http://www.politics.co.uk/news/conferences/lib-dem-conference/-fiscal-decentralisation-to-solve-english-question-$1240676.htm

Who is actually representing the interests of England? Who is properly taking into account the interests of the majority?

-

Danny · 16-09-2008, 10:22 AM

Its high time the English question was answered and the unfair Bartnett formula scrapped.At present nobody is representing England its high time the three main parties stopped burying there heads in the sand and addressed the in balance so that we can be all treated as equals not second class citzens which the people of England are treated at the moment.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

16-09-2008, 10:22 AM	#2 (permalink)
Danny Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 794	Its high time the English question was answered and the unfair Bartnett formula scrapped.At present nobody is representing England its high time the three main parties stopped burying there heads in the sand and addressed the in balance so that we can be all treated as equals not second class citzens which the people of England are treated at the moment.