Originally Posted by Dissident Congress

If your idea of the 21st Century is David "the dipstick" Cameron and his Blue-Lib-Dems or even Blue-Labour then that's fine by me, but never forget that your return to the Tories plus the abolition of the CDA has disappointed many people.

Originally Posted by Kali Morrigan

That's a silly reply. Of course pre 2000 politics is taught in Universities, many topics that are considered anachronistic today are the backbone of most subjects. Knowledge requires paradigms and all aspects of a subject are open to analysis. In the political world that effects social and economic aspects of the world today, pre 2000 politics no longer has a workable place. It depends how exactly how you would want things to move back, if it is radically then you have no chance. I don't think gc is saying pre 2000 politcs should be dropped, I think he is saying it has no place now in practical politics.

Originally Posted by Mikeuk

I laughed my bollox off when I wrote to you as a 'critic of Mike Smith' under a phoney ID and you proceeded to tell me what you thought of the slimy *******.

Originally Posted by British-Conservatism

"pre 2000 politics no longer has a workable place"

I wouldnt say so since we are now ran along 1960's and 70's Trotskyite lines.

Originally Posted by Gregory Lauder-Frost

Maybe Mr Cartright can explain to each and every one of us the significant difference in "politics" in 2008 from 1998, and 1988 etc. He might also consider writing to all the universities in Britain to tell them that pre-2000 politics now has no meaning whatsoever and should be dropped from all classes on Politics.

Originally Posted by gc

I never heard anything as stupid as this from a person who claims to be educated.

Originally Posted by Kali Morrigan

It’s quite a general consensus actually.



It doesn’t matter he was a member of the BNP, lets stick to the point here, mikeuk is making threats and side remarks because of their past affiliations with a Nazi party, why is it that you and mikeuk think your excuses are somehow credible, who do you think you are?



Good for you, I said according to the Guardian I did not say it was a fact. I am happy to read you defending yourself against being a member of the Nazi BNP.



I read it in Hugh Muir’s diary and Richard Bartholomew, you Swirling and Anderson.


Thank you, for the compliment.



Well you ended up resorting to personal smears, so just how low can you get Gregory! he isn't in the NF now, so what has it got to so with the now? Really I would love to know, why you and your other CDA colleagues despite backgrounds of far right activity should have the temerity to bring up someone's right wing past as a way of attacking him, you are beyond the pale.

Originally Posted by gc

"Prior to WWI the Tory Party...."

If you want to know why right-wing politics have failed, then one might consider their position of perspective, and their subsequent total disenfranchisement.

Yep. At the dawn of the 21st century we need to worry about what the Tories were thinking "prior to WW2".

Actually, those of us who, like our children, live in a different age, might consider this to be not politics, but history!

Originally Posted by Gregory Lauder-Frost

Are you on something or just confused? Are you unable to properly answer my points?

Do you know what "far-right" activity actually is/means?

Originally Posted by Kali Morrigan

Gregory I answered all you points adequately, just admit that you are out of your depth and are stalling with that last sentence.