YCHTT wrote:-
Quote:
|
We don't believe this is true Clippo - as Monckton and countless others have demonstrated through countless non-mainstream articles posted.
|
You are utterly & absolutely wrong YChTT. In this case, & most of Monckton's other allegations, he has attempted to recalculate certain sets of data to show that AGW is either false or that it doesn't matter.
In every case, those with far greater mathematical abilities than you or I, have found critical flaws in his logic, be that cherry-picking data or using assumptions that have unsound mathematical bases. In this particular APS case, if you had read particularly my middle link earlier, Monckton introduces a 'factor' into the calculation which is a third of that used by everybody and cannot justify why he did so.
I recall acres of postings you have had with Akria and Besoeker on the subject of 'proof'. But one thing I think they and most intellectuals agree is that only only in mathematics is a logical 'proof' absolute.
You are simply too paranoid about your 'conspiracy' theories to accept, as the rest of the world does, that AGW is real & won't go away on the flawed calculations of shills like Monckton.
You asked me for 'proof' - I've given it to you. Now you 'prove' to me that AGW is a con.
( & no 2nd or 3rd hand 'cr*p from Infowars or similar crackpot sources please, - just peer-reviewed science please).