Quote:
Originally Posted by Clippo
PS to my previous post :-
If my answer wasn't technical enough for you, you might like to vist this site:-
SOTC: Sea Ice
(Got some good graphs too!)  |
Clippo,
You haven't answered my simple question.
You don't need to give me a load of technical waffle to answer it.
I asked what circumstances with regard to the ice caps meting/freezing would dictate evidence for or against the argument that they are melting or not.
I don't want a load of technical jargon - just answer this basic question please.
For example, what about the claim in the article "A comparison of these maps (derived from NSIDC data) below shows that Arctic ice extent was 30 per cent greater on August 11, 2008 than it was on the August 12, 2007. (2008 is a leap year, so the dates are offset by one.)"
You constantly dismiss scientific claims like this with your unscientific conspiracy theories (based on no evidence that I can see), but if it IS true(which I don't expect you to admit) then WOULD that be evidence against AGW ?
If not then what
would be evidence for or against AGW with respect to the melting of the icecaps ?
Answer the question please.....