Michael mcgough: I mean 'significant capital movement' a significance emanating from the amount. The accounting methods in the past have not been advantageous for the membership, and one more beneficial and cost-effective is possible.
Mark Croucher: Information about this matter could be disseminated in the Independence. Secondly, only those regions to which the error applies would need new papers. The regions are clearly stated on the voting papers. Differentiating the new voting papers from the original ones, where necessary, could be effected by a change of colour. Incidentally, are we being told that the 'sequential numbers' on the voting papers, have not in the past, been subject to an optical reader? A common piece of office equipment. How have, 'double-voting' risks been monitored in the past?
When the NEC and Political Committee, agreed to allow Christoppher Gill to go on holiday, and not even a replacement was deemed necessary, that was a grievour error, was it not? Wouldn't it have been wise to request from the printer 'proof samples' prior to a full production? Rather than refuting my criticism, you are producing evidence in abundance which supports my case.
|