Quote:
Originally Posted by Aardvark
DD, I have always stated that I am a non-practising Barrister, for clarity.
Data is subject to copyright, but is also subject to the DPA. Sine qua non.
|
I am not fully familiar with the rules of DPA. Perhaps you are?
I would have thought copyright is exclusive and of prime priority, and without a complaint to the DPA from the
owner of material (which is subject to DPA) and which has been transferred without permission from said owner, - that there is no cause for involvement of the DPA. Yes / no?
Or, to be more specific; is it not the case that West has no grounds for complaint as the copyright of material using his image and words has passed from him to the party?
What is your opinon?
Thanks.
DED.
-