Aardvark, I think maybe you're missing the point here....
Forgetting your comments relating to "devoid of typos, poor English and drivel about Bilderbergers and treason" for the moment, the important point here is:
"net neutrailty"
It means everyone can post whatever they like within the confines of the law (which includes free speech by the way irrespective of personal beliefs or communist government controls) allowing an open platform and level playing field for
everyone, not just those websites you or the government sees fit to censor.
There is a clear parallel to be drawn between freedom of speech in public(1st amendment for example ?) and freedom of expression over the internet.
If you really do like Anthony's website and don't want to see it disappear along with youtube, then you better understand that political websites (including those affiliated to political parties) will not be exempt from censorship.
The same in all likelihood applies to websites where users can upload their own material e.g. personal videos.
The government's loathing of "youtube" is not becasue of "social networking" sites, like myspace (who ironically already already censor material), it is becuse of the 9/11 truth movement and alternative media which are undermining the government's deceit and manipulation and exposing the New World Order.
That is the real reason, whether you agree with the movement or not.
Cited examples which include "protecting children" or "music sales" are simply a cover to sell the idea to the public.
If you care about the internet as we know it, then I suggest you read the thread:
http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/talk...-too-late.html