Quote:
Originally Posted by mrabody
Why not show a little sympathy for Annabelle who appears also to have behaved badly and has suffered the consequences. But no, Annabelle is close to the party leadership whom you hate, and so rather than giving her the benefit of the doubt or according her a little sympathy you all scream that the party must pursue her WITH THE UTMOST VIGOUR.
That spells H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-S-Y in my book, but then I've come to expect it from you and your ilk.
|
Oh dear, the ad hominem attack we've come to expect.
1. Why sympathy for an employee who has lost her job through illegal actions? what is there to be sympathetic about?
2. I don't 'hate' the party leadership. Hate is a which requires personal knowledge of the individuals. I'm sure manyof them are nice people - I just think in this case, and many others, they have not shown good leadership and in general, act to take the course of least resistance.
3. Yes, the party should pursue wrongdoers with the utmost vigour. For the simple reason, if they do not, they will look as if they are complicit in the whole thing. A half decent lawyer could make mincemeat of UKIP based on the two FACTS of a) no disciplinary panel for JW and b) no follow up action for fuller. can't you see that?